Revealed: Nationalisation of utilities would save the UK billions, according to new report

UK households would save £7.8 billion a year if water, energy grids, and Royal Mail were nationalised, according to a new report by the University of Greenwich for We Own It.

Households would be £142 better off a year on average as a result of nationalising energy grids, and £113 better off if English water companies were nationalised.

This is after compensating for returning shareholders’ investment under nationalisation, which would cost £49.7 billion.

This figure is significantly lower than the £200 billion quoted by the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) as it would only repay shareholders the money they invested, rather than paying ‘market values’, which would result in excessive returns at the expense of UK households.

There is no legal obligation for the government to pay market value when nationalising industries. Both Labour and Conservative governments have nationalised without paying full compensation.

For example, Labour nationalised Railtrack in 2002 for £500 million, a sum the courts accepted as lawful.

Professor David Hall, co-author of the report, said “nationalisation would pay for itself in less than seven years”.

Meanwhile, the £3.6 billion takeover of Royal Mail by Czech billionaire Daniel Křetínský is due to complete later this month.

Renationalising water companies

Public ownership of water companies would reduce water bills by £3–5bn a year.

The report finds 35p of every £1 on English water bills goes to shareholders. In Scotland, just 8p in every £1 goes to shareholders, and bills are £113 lower.

“We’re all paying a 35% ‘privatisation tax’ on our water bills,” said Matthew Topham, lead campaigner at We Own It. “By ditching private shareholders and bringing water back into public ownership, we will save up to £5 billion a year.”

The government has previously claimed it would cost up to £100 billion to renationalise water.

The figure has been widely debunked, with Labour MP Clive Lewis calling it “a smokescreen by private companies” to protect private ownership.

Topham added: “By refusing to take water into public ownership, the government is starving our water sector of billions of investment every single year – they must act now before the entire system collapses.”

The Guardian view on Britain’s broken economy: ‘That’s your bloody GDP, not ours’

Editorial

Despite growth in 2024, living standards fell. Inequality, weak public investment and government cuts threaten prosperity. Labour must offer voters something different.

The picture painted by official data for the UK economy in 2024 reveals a country broken by 14 years of Conservative party rule. True, the economy grew – somewhat unexpectedly – but GDP per head fell, showing prosperity didn’t reach most people. There are a few reasons for this decline but none suggests a healthy society. One is runaway wealth inequality, with gains hoarded at the top. Another is stark regional disparities, with some areas falling further behind despite national GDP rising. A third is rising immigration without enough job creation – more workers, but not enough well-paying positions.

A growing economy means little if it doesn’t improve living standards. In 2024, it didn’t. This political reality has shaped recent years, and not in a good way. It’s worth recalling a Newcastle woman’s tart response to the political scientist Anand Menon in 2016 when he warned that Brexit would hit GDP: “That’s your bloody GDP, not ours.” That continuing frustration explains the current backlash against mainstream politicians. No wonder Sir Keir Starmer wants his party to be one of disruption.

Thursday’s growth figures offer the prime minister a chance to break the mould of British politics. Unfortunately, he seems reluctant to act. What’s clear from the statistics is that, in 2024, government spending drove growth – boosted by rising wages, especially in the public sector – rather than business investment or net trade. Labour could challenge the status quo with a new economic vision centred on the state. Instead, unfortunately, the government promotes the idea that growth depends on government inaction in the face of unfettered capitalism.

Statistics often disguise the state’s role, framing public services as just another economic input rather than the engine of demand they are. This distortion makes the economy look more market-driven than reality, reinforcing neoliberal myths. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, unfortunately, seems more eager to conform to these narratives than challenge them. She plans to cut public sector net borrowing from March 2025 to meet fiscal rules – austerity by another name. The last time this happened, post-2010, it led to a decade of weak growth and stagnant wages. The justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, gets it. This week, she called out austerity’s role in wrecking probation services. If she was trying to change the chancellor’s mind, she deserves thanks. Britain can’t afford years of cuts.

One of John Maynard Keynes’ sharpest insights was what’s good for society isn’t always good for profits. That’s why the Green Alliance, a thinktank, is right – injecting £3bn into discounting rail fares to boost passenger miles by 22% is smart economics. It’s a win for regional growth, for the climate and for cleaner air. The state has the power to make capitalism work for the public – if it chooses to use it. But Labour’s delay on releasing its industrial strategy is a worrying sign.

The UK must move away from a debt-driven, low-wage, financialised economic model. Public investment in infrastructure – especially in underserved regions – and in skills and industry is needed to stimulate demand and create high-quality jobs. Raising wages and reducing inequality will ensure broad-based prosperity, not just asset bubbles. The belief that “markets know best” has prevented bold action on Britain’s yawning economic divides and the climate emergency. After 40 years of weakening the state and rewarding rentier capitalism, reform is urgent. Labour must build a system that delivers it.

Guardian 13/02/2025

theguardian